Raezenoth
Poster
Posts: 79
World: Arabek
Pronoun: He
|
Post by Raezenoth on May 17, 2015 2:05:12 GMT
I have noticed that there is a certain section of social sharing that has of yet been ignored. I am rectifying this mistake. This is a place to share games native to your world, and to find other players that you would like to play those games with. I will start. Arabek.txt (1.62 KB)
|
|
|
Post by Leaf on May 17, 2015 2:16:16 GMT
A lot of my favourite games require technology that isn't available in all worlds, but two of my more ancient and portable favourites are chess and go; I'll attach descriptions.
[Attached: Go (Games as Old as Time, unnumbered series) Chess (Games as Old as Time, unnumbered series)]
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 17, 2015 2:18:29 GMT
If people were to want to play that game with you, how would you recommend ensuring fairness for the random elements? Anybody could easily lie about whether an acolyte betrayed them or about what territory they rolled, and I don’t think anybody on this forum has a way to verify the result of a die roll in another universe. The keeper comes closest, but I expect she would have a hard time finding the right die.
|
|
Raezenoth
Poster
Posts: 79
World: Arabek
Pronoun: He
|
Post by Raezenoth on May 17, 2015 2:20:33 GMT
Interesting.
I realize it was perhaps not clear - I am willing to play Arabek with anyone that asks, and am willing to try other games.
Leaf, I have read your game rules, and I believe I would like to play chess.
Andrew, I will manage random elements if other players do not seem trustworthy. I am trustworthy.
|
|
|
Post by Gray Librarian on May 17, 2015 2:22:48 GMT
I enjoy Sprawl, which is a variation on Go. Sprawl is played on an infinite board with an unlimited number of stones available and an arbitrary number of players, and instead of a strict turn order each player may place at most one stone per day. Additional players may join a game already in progress.
Placing stones very far away from existing stones is discouraged but not forbidden.
|
|
Raezenoth
Poster
Posts: 79
World: Arabek
Pronoun: He
|
Post by Raezenoth on May 17, 2015 2:24:33 GMT
Gray Librarian, I do not believe I have the patience to play Sprawl, but maybe someone else will. Thank you regardless.
|
|
|
Post by Leaf on May 17, 2015 2:26:01 GMT
I'll play chess with you if you like, Raezenoth. By private message, maybe?
|
|
Raezenoth
Poster
Posts: 79
World: Arabek
Pronoun: He
|
Post by Raezenoth on May 17, 2015 2:26:40 GMT
That is agreeable.
|
|
|
Post by Mother Starlight on May 17, 2015 2:30:53 GMT
I could add a random-number feature, if it wouldn't be redundant with Raezenoth.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 17, 2015 2:32:50 GMT
I would not lie if I were handling random elements, but I could understand if other people didn’t believe that. Unless you have Esthfora’s power, saying that you are trustworthy doesn’t necessarily get people to trust you. The first game that comes to mind which I enjoy is Clue. [Attached: Description of the game Clue
|
|
Raezenoth
Poster
Posts: 79
World: Arabek
Pronoun: He
|
Post by Raezenoth on May 17, 2015 2:36:13 GMT
Mother of the light of stars - I would welcome a random number feature, in case people that are not gods would like to play with each other.
|
|
|
Post by Mother Starlight on May 17, 2015 3:27:05 GMT
Testing.
78mBVyff2d10
Moderately resistant to cheating, though edited posts might be considered suspect, especially if there's more than one possibility about whether to roll, or what a roll means.2d6
|
|
Raezenoth
Poster
Posts: 79
World: Arabek
Pronoun: He
|
Post by Raezenoth on May 17, 2015 3:41:20 GMT
Interesting. Thank you, mother of the light of stars.
|
|
|
Post by Dotted Lines on May 17, 2015 4:01:28 GMT
For me, its just showing up as text that reads "2d10". Is that supposed to happen?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 17, 2015 4:35:18 GMT
I see this as rolling two ten-sided dice and getting 8 each time. Is this what everybody else sees if they see any results?
Mother Starlight, how do you mean about edited posts? Do edited posts count as a reroll, or do they get the same results?
And, checking another roll:
The original roll was 5, 1, 1, 6, 12.
8P28pruX5d175d17
|
|